This post is the first of four that will analyze the major federal parties' positions and record on Israel-Palestine. Read my introductory piece for the series here.
Position on
Israel-Palestine
Prime Minister Stephen Harper and his caucus have repeatedly
said that Canada and Israel are “the greatest friends” (those were the words Harper
used in his speech to the Israel parliament, the Knesset, in January of 2014).
What he actually means, of course, is that his government staunchly supports
the status quo in Israel. He supports Israel’s military and settlers continuing
their occupation of Palestinian lands in the West Bank. He supports the Israeli
military’s full control and blockade of the borders of the Gaza Strip. He
supports the Israeli government each time they launch a violent assault on the
people of Gaza.
So the question is this: does supporting those Israeli
policies make Canada and Israel “the greatest friends”? I would contend not.
Firstly, those policies run counter to international law. International courts
and human rights organizations have said that repeatedly for years (I won’t go
over all the evidence for that; a simple Google search will give you plenty if
you need it). Does a great friend mean supporting illegal activity? I suppose
it depends on values. The Harper government has repeatedly claimed in domestic
politics that the rule of law is paramount (they have used that language to
support mandatory minimums for criminals and the vast expansion of Canada’s
prison system). But it would appear that the Harper government’s belief in the
rule of law does not extend to its friendship with Israel.
Secondly, Israel’s
belligerence toward Palestinians and continued occupation of their land has
resulted in unending violence for peoples of all ethnicities and religions in
the area (including Jewish Israelis themselves). As academic and public intellectual Noam Chomsky often says, the best way to reduce violence in the
world is to stop participating in it. There is no guarantee that violence will
completely disappear if Israel begins to follow international laws. However, it
is no secret that the reason for most of the violence is Israel’s refusing to
obey those laws. Israel’s law-breaking is the best motivator for violence
against them and the best recruitment tool for groups that carry out violent
acts against Israel and its citizens. If Israel were to begin following
international laws, namely be ending its blockade of Gaza, ending both its
settler and military occupation of the West Bank (including East Jerusalem),
and dismantling the wall it has built in the West Bank, what criticism would be
left to make of it? If the Israeli government truly thinks human rights groups
should be focusing their criticism on Palestinian groups, they would do well to
follow the law themselves.
Conclusion? Israel and Canada are not “the greatest
friends”, despite what the Prime Minister tells us. We would be much better
friends if we articulated the above realities to the Israeli government and to
the world. If we want the violence in Israel and Palestine to continue, then
the Prime Minister is doing no wrong. However, if we are interested in justice
and peace, things need to change in a major way.
Votes in the United Nations General Assembly, while lacking
any teeth, do force governments to take a position on Israel-Palestine. The
standard two-state solution is voted on every year, and under the Conservative
government, Canada voted against the two-state solution for the first time, and
continues to do so every year. The 2014 vote (Res. 69/23 for those who want to
look it up) was 148 countries in favour, 6 opposed, with 8 abstentions. The
countries voting against were Canada, Israel, Marshall Islands, Micronesia,
Palau, and the United States. Harper’s Conservatives also opposed Palestine’sbid for statehood in the UN General Assembly in November 2012 (we were 1 of 9
countries to vote against it). While Canada’s official position is still that
there should be a Palestinian state, the government has not upheld that
position when it comes to voting on it in the UN.
Willingness to
discuss the issue
As far as willingness to discuss the issue of Palestine in
public, the Conservatives are actually arguably the most open about it. Although their
position on the issue of Israel-Palestine is terrible, they seem to be willing
to discuss that position at any time. The Prime Minister speaks about it quite
regularly and is willing to talk at length about it. It is a positive that
anyone who considers the question of Israel-Palestine when they cast their
ballot knows where the Conservatives stand. Clearly those who value justice and
peace will conclude that the country needs a change in government.
Diversity within the
caucus
Due to the leader-dominated nature of politics today, it is
difficult on any issue to see the diversity of opinions within a caucus. That
diversity would mainly be seen within caucus meetings, where it is rarely, if
ever, made public. That said, there is some evidence of
diversity that can be seen within the Conservative caucus on this issue.
Alberta Conservative MP Ted Menzies (who was the last remaining MP who had been
part of the PC side of the Reform-PC merger that created the Conservative Party
of Canada), was the sole Conservative MP who sat on the little-known
Canada-Palestine Parliamentary Friendship Group (the other Conservative member
of the group was a Senator). There are many such associations (they are listed on Parliament's website here) that exist for the purpose of "supporting ongoing parliamentary relations with the identified country or in providing an opportunity for parliamentarians interested in a specific international cause to engage with colleagues with a similar interest."
I have obtained a relatively recent list of the members of the Canada-Palestine Parliamentary Friendship Group, and there are two Conservative officials listed as members: Lois Brown, MP for Newmarket-Aurora (Ontario), and Senator Raynell Andreychuk (Saskatchewan). Senator Andreychuk was appointed by Prime Minister Mulroney and is notably the Chair of the Senate Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Trade. Beyond their membership in this group, I do not have any additional information on MP Brown or Senator Andreychuk's positions on Israel-Palestine. But given the absence of any other information on Conservatives showing any support for Palestinians, their membership in the group alone is notable.
I do my best to see any sign of a Conservative
even remotely sympathetic to Palestine, and the only thing I have seen outside of the Canada-Palestine Parliamentary Friendship Group was MP
Brad Butt of Mississauga-Streetsville attending a charity BBQ event in his
riding hosted by a group called Palestine House. It didn't seem like a significant thing at the time, but I documented it when he tweeted about his attendance at the event. It turned out that last month Ezra Levant's outfit The Rebel Media (using the term "media" very loosely) put out a blog about how outrageous it was that Thomas Mulcair met with representatives of Palestine House. While I'm not convinced Palestine House is doing anything wrong, Levant I suppose should be equally outraged at the Conservatives for having one of their MPs support this organization. The event is documented on Mr. Butt's listing of community events on his website here and the tweet is here.
Seeing the diversity within a caucus, again, is not something that is generally accessible to the public and is very reliant on these sorts of small bits of information. If anyone has any further information to share, I would be happy to help get it out into the open.
Conclusion
To sum up, the Conservative Party has been terrible on every aspect of policy with regard to Israel-Palestine. Although a tiny bit of diversity is apparent within the caucus, nearly every time I see or hear a Conservative MP talking about Israel-Palestine, it is in defense of the status quo in Israel and nearly always ignores the human rights of Palestinians. I could locate examples, but I think they're easy enough for anyone with a computer to find. While the other parties are far from perfect on the issue of Israel-Palestine (more on that in the forthcoming parts of this blog series), the Conservative Party is by far the worst choice for Canadians wanting justice and peace in Israel-Palestine.